March 14, 2023
xx min read

The Insurance Industry Talent and Technology Tug of War

Understaffing and unfilled positions are adding up to a big loss for commercial property and casualty (P&C) insurance providers and their underwriting teams.

By John Stammen, Convr CEO\nThe insurance industry, known as one of the oldest and most traditional industries for a younger generation of workers, is under press to perform. Following “the great resignation,” insurance companies are faced with even greater talent challenges than what they were experiencing before the COVID-19 pandemic.\nYou see, this manifested in the tug of war brewing between bosses and employees around in-office work. In a post-pandemic environment, across industries and many other industries, we continue to see workers walk away from traditional in-person jobs in hopes of securing work-from-home positions that lean toward a more flexible work environment.\nThis tug of war was underscored in findings uncovered in the Insurance Talent and Tech Trends Survey my company Convr recently commissioned. The survey screened a statistically significant sample of insurance underwriting leaders and reconfirmed that there’s a growing talent pool demanding remote work opportunities in the current insurance labor market. The survey data also strongly suggests that if insurance providers improve their technology stack, they can attract more and better talent; and those workers would have a greater ability to work successfully from home.\nThis is the undeniable future of the insurance industry’s labor market. It requires companies to increase flexibility and modernize their processes to offer an increasing number of remote and hybrid work opportunities, as the appetite for these jobs will only increase from here. Workers see remote roles as bringing a glimmer of hope to what a balanced work-life could look like; while underwriting leaders say remote positions and work opportunities are the most common request made by new underwriting hires.

Here’s what the staffing situation looks like now:

  • 64% of underwriting leaders say their team is currently understaffed
  • 63% of underwriting leaders aren’t sure they are staffed for growth
  • 56% of underwriting leaders say more than 20% of their job openings have remained unfilled for three months or longer

Considering the typical day in the life of a commercial property and casualty (P&C) underwriter, it doesn’t take much imagination to understand, with better tech solutions, how many common tasks can be better performed, if not automated entirely — satisfying employees to work at home while improving productivity.\nIndeed, 78% percent of underwriting teams say better technology, internal or outsourced, prevents employee attrition and could keep people on the job longer, with nearly 90% certain that better technology helps attract younger talent. Job satisfaction can only improve with remote work options, as some commercial P&C insurance managers and above believe that remote-only underwriting workers are less likely to quit than those in-office.\nTechnology is clearly the direction of today’s underwriting teams, and nearly 85% of leaders already expect more underwriting work to be automated. A huge driver could be that most underwriting leaders believe that manual data entry, central to the job of an underwriter, is tedious. On any given day, an underwriter typically analyzes information on insurance applications and other sources for sometimes many hours to collect the data required to determine risk exposures, appropriate premiums and amounts of coverage.\nStill, many underwriting teams have long lists of open jobs. The quantitative skills needed for underwriting are also in high demand in other industries such as tech and artificial intelligence (AI), so carriers continue to grapple with attracting and hiring a diverse core of young talent. Moreover, a younger talent pool expects a workplace with digital technology solutions and tools at their fingertips (something traditional brick-and-mortar insurers and reinsurers are not known for).\nAs it turns out, the industry is not fully addressing worker demand. Despite the numbers above, only 10% of insurance leaders say their team is attempting to attract underwriting talent by offering remote work opportunities. When insurance providers don’t meet worker expectations for jobs, they can fall further behind — turning off talent and widening the gap between qualified candidates and vacant roles.\nWorse, understaffing and unfilled positions are adding up to loss. Some 48% of underwriting leaders say understaffing is negatively affecting their expense ratio. Nearly 44% of commercial P&C executives also indicate that with some frequency, understaffing causes inaccurate information to inform their quotes. There is not much optimism surrounding hiring for underwriting teams, either, with only 39% of underwriting leaders highly confident they’ll hit their hiring quotas in 2023 – a terrifying number that will keep many up at night this year. An incentive to keep younger staff on the job — for a period, at least – is by recalibrating the dynamic of how teams work and balance remote life.\nTo do that, they must recognize that true transformation requires more than new technology. Insurers, producers and reinsurers need to begin shifting their organizational mindset and culture. This is the secret to true competitive advantage. If remote roles do not mesh with your operation, another strong option is to adopt innovative digital solutions.\nIn 2023, insurance companies should be primed to transform underwriting operations and talent management efforts if they want to remain competitive. Significantly more underwriting tasks could be automated. Remote work remains a big demand of new hires and prospective talent. Recent data underscores a critical gap exists between operational realities and the expectations of effective talent around technology and automation. As such, technology remains the key to recruitment and retention.

blogs

Keep Reading

More articles on AI, underwriting and the future of commercial P&C.

XX MIN READ

The Convr Risk Context Engine: Why it Matters to the Chief Underwriting Officer

The problem every Chief Underwriting Officer (CUO) faces isn't a shortage of AI tools. It's a shortage of AI they can trust and embed seamlessly within their workflow.

Generative models, agentic assistants, and large language models have proliferated across the insurance industry at an unprecedented pace. Nearly all of them share the same critical flaw: they’re built on general-purpose foundation models that were never trained on commercial insurance and have never seen a real submission, a real loss run, or a real underwriter's decision. They can produce fluent text about underwriting without understanding it. For a CUO responsible for combined ratios, regulatory defensibility, and the consistency of thousands of risk decisions per year, that gap is a material liability.

The Convr Risk Context Engine (RCE) is the answer to that problem and it’s the only answer of its kind.

What makes the RCE unique

Unveiled on June 9, 2026, the RCE is a commercial P&C knowledge graph and semantic ontology that encodes the language, structures, exposures, classifications, and decision logic of underwriting into a unified, machine-readable model, calibrated against a decade of real submissions, real exposures, and real underwriter feedback from leading carriers in production.

The practical implication of that architecture is profound. The RCE does not approximate what a painting contractor is; it knows the difference between a painting contractor and a roofing contractor at the classification level and it knows how that difference should affect appetite, coverage, and pricing. It understands that "general liability for a habitational account in coastal Florida" carries a specific set of exposure signals that have nothing in common with "general liability for a light manufacturing operation in the Midwest." Rather than just pattern recognition over text, the RCE is structured knowledge about commercial insurance, expressed as a machine-readable graph that every AI capability in the Convr workbench runs on top of.

Calibrated on a decade of production data and more than 2,500 integrated sources, the RCE powers every AI capability across the Convr AI Underwriting Workbench from intake to business classification, risk scoring, data enrichment, and workflows.

Why this matters operationally to the CUO

The CUO's mandate is to make good risk decisions, consistently, at scale, in ways the organization can defend and document exactly with reliability. The RCE advances all these dimensions simultaneously.

Consistency: One of the most persistent sources of combined ratio deterioration is inconsistent appetite application . . . underwriters in different territories or teams making materially different decisions on similar risks. The RCE delivers consistent, traceable, verifiable risk data, in-line, which means the same exposure in the same class code is evaluated against the same criteria every time, regardless of which underwriter opens the file or which office processes the submission. The CUO sets the appetite rules; the RCE enforces them uniformly.

Defensibility: Every classification, appetite call, and risk-score output traces back through the ontology to the source submission documents, loss data, and underwriter decisions that informed it. The regulatory direction is reinforcing the value of the RCE. When a regulator, reinsurer, or internal audit function asks why a particular account was accepted or declined, the answer is not a probability score from a black box. It is a documented chain of reasoning tied to real data. In a regulatory environment that is increasingly scrutinizing AI-driven decisioning, audit-ready outputs are not a nice-to-have. They are becoming a condition of doing business.

Scale: The RCE reduces submission-through-quote times by 70% and increases new business win rates. Carriers using the Convr AI Underwriting Workbench have documented an 8% combined ratio improvement on commercial auto lines, 20,000 submissions per month processed fully automatically on non-admitted lines, and 38% more quotes generated per underwriting assistant on financial lines, with quote generation time dropping from two hours to 20 minutes. These are not projections. They are outcomes from carriers already running the RCE in production.

The distinction that separates the RCE from everything else

As Convr Chief Executive Officer John Stammen stated at the RCE launch, "Everyone talks about models. The real question is what they're grounded in. Without a commercial P&C knowledge graph and ontology underneath them, generative and agentic AI are confident guessers. The RCE supplies the missing context . . . what a submission means, what an exposure is, what an underwriter decides . . . and turns outputs into decisions a carrier can defend."

That framing captures the CUO's core concern precisely. A CUO does not need AI that sounds right. They need AI that is right, and that can prove it. Convr unifies fragmented insurance data into a structured data model powered by ontology, schema, semantics, and a knowledge graph within the context engine . . . preserving risk relationships and enabling assistive AI to deliver decision-ready underwriting insights and trace those insights to any historical moment in time. The RCE is the infrastructure that transforms raw submission data, third-party enrichment, and historical loss experience into a single, coherent view of a risk, in real time, at the point of decision.

What this means for the CUO's book of business

For small commercial and BOP books, the RCE eliminates the premium leakage and adverse selection that accumulates when submissions are classified by hand. Business classification errors, misapplied territory codes, and underclassed risks . . . the chronic sources of ratio deterioration on high-volume books are caught at intake before they ever reach a rating engine.

For mid-market and multi-line accounts, the RCE compresses the enrichment cycle that consumes the most underwriter time. Rather than spending two to three days researching an account before rating, an underwriter opens the submission to find the business already classified, the exposure already verified, prior loss signals already surfaced, and appetite already scored against the carrier's own guidelines. The judgment call that makes underwriting valuable happens in minutes rather than days.

For large and complex accounts, the RCE provides the CUO with something that has historically been impossible to achieve at scale: a portfolio-level view of risk concentration, exposure accumulation, and appetite consistency across the entire book, updated continuously as new submissions are processed. The CUO who can see the book in real time, rather than waiting for a quarterly report is the CUO who can act on emerging trends before they become loss events.

The bottom line

The Convr Risk Context Engine is the foundational infrastructure that makes AI in commercial underwriting legitimate. It’s grounded in a decade of real production data, structured around the actual language and logic of commercial P&C insurance, and designed to produce outputs that underwriters, CUOs, and regulators can all defend. For the CUO who is already being asked by their board and their reinsurers how they are using AI, and who cannot afford the answer to be "we're experimenting," the RCE is the answer that closes the gap between AI's promise and underwriting's requirements.

XX MIN READ

Glean Insights on Hard-to-Find Small Businesses with Convr’s Biz Intel Feature

A huge portion of commercial property and casualty (P&C) insurance applicants barely exist online. Many small and mid-size commercial insureds (the bread and butter of commercial insurance underwriting) are nearly invisible online.

Think about it . . . landscapers, contractors, florists and more. The  food truck owners, small town auto mechanics and mom and pop shops . . . many don’t have:

  • a website
  • a strong social media presence
  • consistent business filings
  • complete insurance applications

Underwriting team members call this a low digital footprint risk and it’s a problem for them. When the submission comes in, they need to know if the business is real, if the owners do what they claim to do, and if the exposure is what the agent says it is.

But if the business has no digital presence, the underwriter is lost without their normal verification tools including website and online reviews, access to pertinent safety records and satellite exposure checks as well as prior filings.

That’s where Convr’s AI Underwriting Workbench shines. With our Biz Intel web search feature for low digital footprint companies, that hard to find information easily turns up for the underwriter within our underwriting platform.

The Convr Underwriting Workbench’s Biz Intel can uncover:

1) Business Classification

2) Appetite relevant exposures

3) Number of employees

4) Revenue

It turns an unknown into a knowable risk, giving the underwriter the opportunity to decide whether or not to write the risk rather than to spend time investigating it further. It’s a shortcut for underwriting team members of all levels as they spend less time searching for the details that move the decision.

All in one place:

In the Convr AI Underwriting Workbench, every new submission with the web option enabled, runs Biz Intel and returns the results inline. The hard-to-find details land next to the submission you're working on, not three tabs away from it.

Why it matters:

Low-digital-footprint submissions take time that underwriters often can't justify spending. Enrichment surfaces the missing data automatically, so accounts that would have been deprioritized or declined for lack of information become writable.

Convr’s Biz Intel users get:

1) First-quote advantage: Brokers place business with the first to quote. If your underwriting team is out searching Google, the Secretary of State, checking maps and emailing questions – you could be missing out on deals. With Convr AI data enrichment, the data comes to the underwriter instead of the other way around – and the first quote is more often yours.

2) Reduced referral dependency: When reliable information on low digital footprint companies is available in the file, more submissions can be decided where they land. Junior underwriters escalate only the accounts that genuinely need a second set of eyes. Senior underwriters spend their time on the complex risks and judgment calls that actually require their experience – not on questions a richer file would have answered on its own. Across the team, consistency improves and cycle times tighten.

3) Greater portfolio profitability: This is the real return on investment. Commercial carriers rarely lose money on catastrophic risks. Instead, they lose money on thousands of slightly mispriced/misunderstood small and mid-size policies – and low-visibility insureds are exactly where this is most common.

Convr's AI Underwriting Workbench isn't a productivity system. It's a loss ratio control system. If thin-file submissions are costing your team time or premium, we should talk – visit us at convr.com today.

XX MIN READ

Convr Accelerates MGA Growth

From Intake automation efficiency to data modeling for hidden insights, Convr is helping Managing General Agents (MGAs) turn fragmented submission documents into structured, enriched data – accelerating clearance, rating, and quote times to unleash profitable growth.

Everyone knows the best models win at taming documents!\nOur Intake module ingests and enriches data from both structured and unstructured documents including PDFs, Excel and emails across commercial property and casualty (P&C) insurance asset types, including ACORDs, Inspection Forms, SOVs, Loss Runs, Schedules, and more.

Powered by Convr AI and the Risk Context Engine – a purpose-built commercial insurance ontology, knowledge graph, and semantic layer that powers a multi-line schema – transforming fragmented submissions into structured, decision-ready intelligence. By grounding every document, application and data source into a consistent schema, Convr Intake ensures contextually complete, consistent, and reliable data from the start. The result is faster processing, fewer manual touchpoints, and improved risk clarity for accelerated MGA Growth.

Through Risk 360 – a commercial insurance data lake comprised of the digital footprints of millions of businesses – Convr standardizes addresses, performs geo-coding, enriches submissions with CAT modeling codes, and adds property intelligence data such as distance to coast and other hazard indicators. The enrichment delivers a holistic decision-ready view of risk prepared for underwriting, rating, and carrier reporting.

By eliminating re-keying and reducing back-and-forth data gathering, submissions are ready to quote in less than 10 minutes! This is how our MGA customers underwrite smarter and faster to unlock substantial written-premium growth without adding to headcount.

If you’re exploring ways to scale faster with AI, better data and meaningful operational efficiency, Convr welcomes the opportunity to share how leading MGAs are using Convr today.\nJust reach out to Convr today to see how we can help!

Realize End-to-End Underwriting Excellence with Convr AI

Experience how commercial P&C insurance organizations benefit from submission through quote with a frictionless process enriched by AI decisioning, empowering them to make better decisions, faster.